=


House Tax Stimulus Bill Hijacked

By Stephen Breitstone
Long Island Business News
November 9, 2001

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed legislation that was widely touted as the tax stimulus package required to "fix" the economy, which has stalled in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Upon closer scrutiny, this legislation seems more like a feeding frenzy for special interest groups that is merely wrapped in a stimulus package.

Could it be that the special interest groups and the legislators that represent them are taking improper advantage of the current climate and outcry for a tax stimulus package to further their own agenda? I had hoped that in the wake of the World Trade Center tragedy, we had somehow transcended politics as usual. The jury is out.

Perhaps after the Senate produces a bill, the makings of a compromise that represents a true stimulus package will emerge.

Nevertheless, the first salvo passed by the House falls far short of the mark. The problem is the House bill unabashedly puts money in the hands of big business at the expense of providing meaningful stimulus for individuals and small business.

Most egregious is the repeal of the corporate Alternative Minimum Tax and refunding of AMT credits. The passage of the corporate AMT as part of the 1986 tax legislation introduced, for the first time in many years, the possibility that large corporations would actually pay income taxes. Before that, there existed a cottage industry of tax shelter products that virtually insured that with proper planning, large corporations would not have to pay income taxes.

Some say that putting these funds back in the hands of large corporations will create jobs. It might, indirectly. But are these the best jobs to create? I think not. We should not forget that most of the job creation during the 1990s resulted from a renaissance of entrepreneurial spirit and technological innovation that germinated at the level of the small business.

Big business will get enough of a boost from reduced interest rates and the government contracts and spending resulting from the war effort. They do not need further tax subsidies. The emphasis of the tax package needs to be to put money in the hands of the consumer to bring them back into the market. Also, there is a need to encourage individuals and corporations to invest risk capital in small and emerging businesses.

In many ways, small businesses and entrepreneurs are already at a disadvantage under our tax system. There is no justification for limiting deductions for health insurance for small businesses operating as partnerships, limited liability companies and S corporations. The costs of health insurance of those entities should be made fully deductible immediately. Maximum individual income taxes - 39.6 percent - are higher than maximum corporate income tax rates - 35 percent.

Also, relief should be afforded those individuals who paid tax on stock market gains that evaporated. They paid tax on the gains without limit, but the losses are only deductible up to $3000. The House Bill does increase that amount to $4,000, but the increase is unlikely to materially alter economic behavior.

Likewise, relief should be given for those who exercised stock options, paid their taxes, only to see stocks decline in value so they to were taxed on gains they never realized.

And the those dreaded passive activity loss rules (section 469) have created a tax disincentive for individuals to invest in ventures. Those rules should be relaxed or repealed.

Finally, the estate tax repeal legislation passed earlier this year needs to be fixed. It now provides for a full repeal of the tax for one year only (2010). That law represents bad tax policy. There is tremendous uncertainty as to whether the repeal will ever go into effect or become permanent. Owners of small business - among the principal intended beneficiaries of the repeal - cannot properly plan in light of this uncertainty. Ultimately, the lack of certainty will damage many small businesses who make the wrong bet on whether estate tax repeal will stick.

Stephen Breitstone is a tax law partner with the Mineola law firm Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Schlissel and can be reached at 516-747-0300 ext. 146 or sbreitstone@mlg.com


190 Willis Avenue Mineola, NY 11501 Tel: (516)747-0300 Fax: (516)747-0653

Home | Attorneys | Practice Areas | Resources | News & Events | About the Firm | Contact Us

© 2001 Meltzer, Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel, LLP Disclaimer Notice | Privacy Policy