Faulty IRA Beneficiary Designations Explode
Estate Plans
By: Irwin Scherago ischerago@mlg.com
& Howard M. Esterces hesterces@mlg.com
Retirement Plans often comprise one of the most significant
assets owned by an individual at his or her death. The Qualified
Plan (401) or the IRA (Sec 408 of the IRC) may comprise
30% to 80% of estates. Retirement plan assets of $1,000,000
or more, ranging from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000, even $3,000,000
to $5,000,000, while not the everyday situations, are appearing
with a higher degree of frequency than ever before. Given
the size of the retirement plans in individual estates,
careful planning of beneficiary designations is essential
to assure that the wishes of the IRA owner or the plan participant
are carried out and that whole classes of beneficiaries
are not unintentionally omitted from sharing in the retirement
plan benefits.
NAMING THE BENEFICIARY: INDIVIDUAL OR TRUST
The beneficiary of a Retirement Plan can be an individual
or a Trust for an individual.
DESIGNATIONS WHEN THERE IS A SURVIVING SPOUSE
OUTRIGHT TO SPOUSE
When there is a surviving spouse, the beneficiary usually
is "to the surviving spouse outright and free of trust."
The benefit of this designation is that the IRA, or other
retirement plan, qualifies for the unlimited marital deduction,
and can be rolled over by the surviving spouse into an IRA
of her own. The surviving spouse can then name children
or grandchildren as beneficiaries, and extend the period
over which taxable minimum distributions must be taken to
perhaps 30 or 40 years or more, depending on the beneficiary's
age. While the surviving spouse is living, distributions
are taken under "minimum distribution incidental benefit"
rules over the life expectancy of the spouse and a hypothetical
beneficiary 10 years younger. When the spouse dies, however,
the period for taking distributions pops up to the beneficiary's
remaining life expectancy.
MARITAL DEDUCTION TRUST (QTIP) AS BENEFICIARY
A marital deduction trust may be the beneficiary of a retirement
plan benefit. An IRA owner may wish to protect the surviving
spouse from his or her own financial shortcomings. Many
husbands and wives are warm and loving mates but when it
come to money, they are financial alimentary canals
in one end and out the other. By paying the IRA to the QTIP
Trust, the participant provides all the basic benefits tor
the surviving spouse no immediate estate taxation
and income taxation on distributions only when received
by the trust and spouse.
In addition, by paying the IRA account to a QTIP Trust,
if the surviving spouse remarries, the Trust asset may be
protected from the second spouse's right of election (usually
one-third of all the spouse's assets). IRAs are usually
considered "testamentary substitutes" in New York
and subject to a surviving spouse's right of election, unless
a valid prenuptial agreement is in place.
The Marital Deduction Trust [QTIP under 2056(b)(7)] of
the Internal Revenue Code and the IRA beneficiary designation
should require the Trustee of the Trust to receive the greater
of the income generated by the IRA during the calendar year
or the minimum required distribution. In addition, the QTIP
must provide that the surviving spouse is to receive all
of the trust net income at least annually. On the death
of the surviving spouse, the QTIP assets generally pass
to the issue of the original IRA owner.
As a result of recent changes in proposed regulations,
an IRA can now be payable to a QTIP created by Will or under
a revocable trust agreement (as well as under an irrevocable
trust agreement, as was previously required) without having
an adverse impact on required minimum distributions.
CREDIT SHELTER TRUST UNDER WILL
OF PLAN PARTICIPANT
Frequently, the combined assets of a husband and wife are
insufficient to fully use (absorb) the Federal Exemption
Equivalent available to the first spouse to die. The Federal
Exemption Equivalent is set forth in the table below.
| |
Federal Exemption
Equivalent |
| 2000-2001 |
$ 675,000 |
| 2002-2003 |
$ 700,000 |
| 2004 |
$ 850,000 |
| 2005 |
$ 950,000 |
| 2006 and after |
$ 1,000,000 |
Any taxpayer dying in the year 2000 can pass $675,000 estate-tax
free to beneficiaries other than a surviving spouse. This
Exemption Equivalent Amount, if not given directly to children
or to a trust for children, is generally placed in trust
for the surviving spouse. The trust provides income for
the surviving spouse and possibly invasion of principal
for the surviving spouse's health, maintenance, support,
and other purposes. Upon the death of the surviving spouse,
the trust ends and the principal balance passes, estate-tax
free, to the children. This is sometimes called, in the
trade, the "Credit Shelter Trust", "Exemption
Equivalent Trust", or "Bypass Trust", because
the assets in the trust are sheltered from estate tax and
bypass estate tax in both spouses' estates.
THE CONUNDRUM INSUFFICIENT
NON-RETIREMENT PLAN ASSETS TO FUND
CREDIT SHELTER TRUST
Many medium-size estates do not have sufficient assets
to fully fund the Credit Shelter Trust unless Retirement
Plans (IRA) Assets are used.
Before January 1, 1998, a plan participant or IRA owner
who lived past his "Required Beginning Date" (generally
April 1st of the year after reaching 701/2) could not, as
a practical matter, use his exemption equivalent or credit
shelter by directly naming a trust under his Will or a revocable
trust as beneficiary. This was because these trusts were
not considered to have any life expectancy. If named, then
only the plan participant's or IRA owner's own life expectancy
could be used in determining minimum distributions. Worse
still, if the "recalculation method" were used,
everything had to come out of the plan or IRA by December
31st of the year following the year of death. While the
amount would be sheltered from estate taxes up to the Federal
Exemption Equivalent, the account was immediately diminished
by the income tax, and this could have been upward of 44%
counting Federal and State income tax.
IRS RULES TRUST HAS LIFE
EXPECTANCY OF ITS BENEFICIARY
On December 30, 1997, the Internal Revenue Service revised
its previously proposed regulations to allow using life
expectancies of beneficiaries of revocable trusts (living
trusts) and of trusts under Wills in setting minimum distributions
(Prop. Reg 1.401(a)(9)-1, D-5(a) as amended on 12/30/97).
Naming an estate as beneficiary is still not advisable -
an estate has no life expectancy. A copy or summary of the
trust (or Will) must be furnished to the plan administrator
or IRA custodian, copies or summaries of amendments must
be furnished, and final versions must be supplied within
9 months following death.
NAMING THE CREDIT SHELTER TRUST
AS PLAN BENEFICIARY
If a prospective decedent has insufficient non-retirement
plan assets to fully fund the Federal Exemption/Credit Shelter
Trust, he or she can now readily designate the whole, or
any part, of the IRA or plan assets to be paid periodically,
over the life expectancy of his or her surviving spouse,
to the Credit Shelter Trust under his Will or living trust.
The first obvious advantage there is no estate tax
up to the Federal Exemption Equivalent.
The second advantage is that there is no requirement that
the Credit Shelter Trust pay out all of the annual net income
of the Trust to, or to the use of, the surviving spouse.
This is not a marital trust which requires all of the income
to be paid out annually to the surviving spouse. Thus, the
underlying value of the plan asset or IRA account as it
grows will escape Federal Estate Taxation upon the death
of the second spouse to die.
CAVEAT: Minimum distributions are taxable income. To the
extent net income is not paid out annually by the trust
(or to the extent minimum distributions are considered as
"principal" for trust accounting purposes, and
thus cannot be passed down to a beneficiary), the trust
may be subject to Federal income tax at the highest trust
income tax rate, (39.6%).
EXAMPLE: IRA payable to Credit Shelter Trust is $675,000;
Minimum Required Distribution based on Life Expectancy of
surviving spouse is $28,603. The income tax on the Trust
if the minimum distribution is not paid out is $10,363,
leaving $18,240 to accumulate in the Trust.
| Minimum Disbursements |
$28,603
|
|
|
| Tax on |
8,650
|
is
|
2,447
|
| Excess |
19,953
|
|
|
| Tax on Excess is |
x .396
|
is
|
7,901
|
| Total Tax |
|
|
$10,348
|
TRUST INCOME TAX IS NOT SO BAD
Before one shrinks back in horror, simply
compare the income tax on the surviving spouse at the 28%
or 31% bracket.
| |
Tax at 28%
|
Tax at 31%
|
| |
$ 8,008
|
$ 8,867
|
| Trust Tax |
10,348
|
10,340
|
| Tax Increase by |
|
|
| Keeping in Trust |
2,340
|
1,481
|
The increase in tax cost by keeping the income in the Trust
and paying the tax at the Trust levels ranges between 16%
(at the 31% tax bracket for an individual beneficiary) and
29% (at the 28% tax bracket for an individual beneficiary).
The lower the individual beneficiary's tax bracket, the
higher the tax cost by allowing the Trust to pay the tax.
OVERALL ESTATE TAX BENEFIT OF THE CREDIT SHELTER TRUST
RETAINING THE INCOME AND PAYING THE INCOME TAX
AS OPPOSED TO PAYING OUT THE INCOME DIRECTLY TO THE
CREDIT SHELTER TRUST BENEFICIARY WHO PAYS THE INCOME TAX
| |
Trust
|
Individual
|
| Minimum Required Distribution |
$ 28,603
|
$ 28,603
|
| Income Tax |
10,348
|
8,867
|
| Annual amount compounded |
18,155
|
19,736
|
| Net annual amount compounded |
|
|
| For 15 years at interest rate |
10%
|
10%
|
| Total Fund in 15 years |
576,821
|
627,052
|
| Estate Tax in Credit Shelter |
0
|
|
| Estate Tax on individual (43%) |
|
(269,963)
|
| New Amount Available for Family |
576,821
|
358,089
|
The foregoing illustrates the benefit of using the Credit
Shelter Trust to accumulate the income and passing it on
to children or grandchildren. If the income is not needed
from the Credit Shelter, then there is a dramatic increase
in assets available to the children and/or grandchildren.
CHANGING EXISTING IRA BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS
TO CREDIT SHELTER AS BENEFICIARY
DESIGNATION MUST BE SENT TO CUSTODIAN OF IRA OR THE PLAN
TRUSTEE
We have found disclaimer provisions to be particularly
useful, even before the change in proposed regulations.
The IRA or plan death benefit is left to the surviving spouse.
The spouse can decide - up to nine months after the first
spouse's death - how much of IRA or plan benefits will be
needed to fund the Credit Shelter Trust. The mechanics involve
a disclaimer or refusal by the spouse to accept all or a
portion of the IRA or plan death benefit. The beneficiary
form would provide that anything disclaimed passes to the
Credit Shelter Trust. Thus, our beneficiary designation
might be as follows:
"Upon my death pay the balance of my account to MARY
MONROE, my wife, if living, and if MARY MONROE, my wife,
is living but disclaims or renounces the whole or any part
of this IRA (retirement account), I direct that my custodian
pay the disclaimed/renounced portion of my IRA (retirement
account) periodically, not less than annually, in the amounts
equal to the Required Minimum Distribution to the Trust
at Clause FOURTH of my Last Will and Testament dated ___________,
2000 or to the Credit shelter Trust of any later Will existing
at my death."
CAVEAT: Not all IRA custodians are willing to accept disclaimer
provisions. In that case some other arrangement would have
to be made, including possibly moving the IRA to a more
accommodating institution.
WILL PROVISION
The Credit Shelter Trust must also have a detailed provision
directing the Trustee to receive the periodic payment and
giving the Trustee the discretion to either pay out the
income to the surviving spouse or to retain the income and,
after the income taxes are paid, to add it to principal.
It is usually advisable to also permit the Trustees to pay
principal to the survivor.
BENEFICIARIES OTHER THAN SPOUSES
There is a serious problem that is not being addressed
in IRA beneficiary designation when there is no surviving
spouse. IRA beneficiary forms provided by custodians often
provide for payment "to my children who survive, share
and share alike".
WHAT IS LEFT OUT IN RETIREMENT PLAN
AND IRA BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS?
If you look at the underlined material of the above quote,
you will see the beneficiary designations overlooked grandchildren.
The grandchildren are overlooked because the beneficiary
designation forms of most brokerage houses do not provide
space for the designation of beneficiaries beyond the spouse
and children.
EXPAND THE BROKERAGE BENEFICIARY FORM
Rectifying the built-in shortcoming of the brokerage form
can and should be done.
Using the form itself, you can insert the underlined words:
Manny Monroe, son, ½, per stirpes
Maxine Monroe, daughter, ½, per stirpes.
But if the form does not give you "per stirpal"
space, then add to the form by an addendum and the addendum,
stapled to the brokerage form and separately signed (and
we recommend witnessed) should read:
"To Manny Monroe and Maxine Monroe, children of the
Participant, equally, share and share alike, and if either
child is not living to said deceased child's then living
issue, per stirpes."
PROCEDURE FOR GIVING NOTICE
TO BROKERAGE HOUSE
1. Sign and staple addendum to brokerage beneficiary form.
Make sure form is witnessed or notarized.
2. Send the form with the addendum and a covering letter,
certified mail, return receipt requested: Why go to such
trouble? Brokerage houses have not been in the beneficiary
designation business long enough to appreciate the significance
of these forms. Many brokerage houses, unlike insurance
companies, whose total business is beneficiaries, handle
the designations cavalierly. Thus, you may very well need
the extrinsic written proof, witnesses and/or notarized,
with a proper mailing receipt, to have the brokerage house
carry out your wish.
CONCLUSION
As we stated at the outset of this article, retirement
plans often comprise the largest portion of many estates.
Therefore, owners of retirement plans and their financial
and tax advisors must give special and careful attention
to beneficiary designations.
|